This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1756287209104830v1 1/2/107    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Allaf, M. E Articles by Guzzo, T. J Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for stage I & II nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors

The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mallaf{at}jhmi.

	Abstract

<atl>Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for stage I and II nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors</atl> <au1><snm>Guzzo</snm><fnms>Thomas J.</fnms><aff>The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Park 223, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA</aff></au1> <au2><snm>Allaf</snm><fnms>Mohamad E.</fnms><aff>The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Park 223, Baltimore, MD 21287</aff></au2>

Objectives: Open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has been traditionally used for the management of patients with nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCTs). Over the last decade, laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (LRPLND) has gained popularity in several highly specialized centers.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the English-language literature with regard to LRPLND. The perioperative and oncologic outcomes for patients with low stage NSGCTs who underwent LRPLND are summarized in this review with particular emphasis on contemporary studies.

Results: Initially only used for staging, LRPLND has evolved to a therapeutic procedure capable of replicating the templates used for open RPLND. Perioperative outcomes including operative time, conversion rates and complications improve with surgeon experience and are acceptable at high volume centers. Oncologic outcomes are promising, but require longer term follow-up and the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in many studies limits comparison to that of the open technique.

Conclusion: LRPLND has been demonstrated to be feasible and safe at large volume institutions with experienced laparoscopic surgeons. LRPLND was originally performed as a staging procedure in patients with NSGCTs but has evolved into a therapeutic operation with early reports demonstrating short hospital stays and minimal morbidity. Further studies in larger cohorts of patients with longer term follow up are required to define the exact role of LRPLND.

First published on May 21, 2009, doi:10.1177/1756287209104830

Therapeutic Advances in Urology 2009;1:107.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?