Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Therapeutic Advances in Urology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1756287209104830v1
1/2/107    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guzzo, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Allaf, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for stage I and II nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors

Thomas J. Guzzo

The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Park 223, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA

Mohamad E. Allaf

The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Park 223, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA, mallaf{at}jhmi.edu

Objectives: Open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has been traditionally used for the management of patients with nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCTs). Over the last decade, laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (LRPLND) has gained popularity in several highly specialized centers.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the English-language literature with regard to LRPLND. The perioperative and oncologic outcomes for patients with low stage NSGCTs who underwent LRPLND are summarized in this review with particular emphasis on contemporary studies.

Results: Initially only used for staging, LRPLND has evolved to a therapeutic procedure capable of replicating the templates used for open RPLND. Perioperative outcomes including operative time, conversion rates and complications improve with surgeon experience and are acceptable at high volume centers. Oncologic outcomes are promising, but require longer term follow-up and the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in many studies limits comparison to that of the open technique.

Conclusion: LRPLND has been demonstrated to be feasible and safe at large volume institutions with experienced laparoscopic surgeons. LRPLND was originally performed as a staging procedure in patients with NSGCTs but has evolved into a therapeutic operation with early reports demonstrating short hospital stays and minimal morbidity. Further studies in larger cohorts of patients with longer term follow up are required to define the exact role of LRPLND.

Key Words: testicular cancer • laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection

This version was published on June 1, 2009

Therapeutic Advances in Urology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 107-114 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1756287209104830


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?